SaNSO-2005 Reviewers
نویسندگان
چکیده
Matthias Anlauff, Kestrel Institute, USA Cristian Borcea, New Jersey Institute of Technology, USA Bart Dhoedt, University of Gent, Belgium Laura Marie Feeney, SICS, Kista, Sweden Bertil Folliot, University of Paris, France Isabelle Guerin Lassous, INRIA, France Gilles Grimaud, University of Lille, France Jean-Louis Lanet, INRIA Sophia-Antipolis, France Stephan Olariu, Old Dominion University, USA Ian Marshall, University of Kent, UK Gilles Muller, Ecole des Mines de Nantes, France David Simplot-Ryl, University of Lille, France Isabelle Simplot-Ryl, University of Lille, France Ivan Stojmenovic, University of Ottawa, Canada Asuman Suenbuel, SAP Research Labs, USA Jie Wu, Florida Atlantic University, USA Wanghong Yuan, NTT DoCoMo, USA
منابع مشابه
Meta-Analysis in Medicine and Health Policy Marcel Dekker, 2000 Dalene Stangl and Donald Berry (eds.)
متن کامل
Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.
Despite its shortcomings, peer review is still the best tool of scientific publishing. It brings benefits not only to the journal and its authors, but to the peer reviewers: they are privileged to have an insight into the latest research and still unpublished results in their scientific field. Reviewers also build up their ability to critically assess scientific papers, which may be useful in t...
متن کاملComputer Recognizes Expert Reviewers
I n this last issue of Computer in 2005, I would like to extend my gratitude to the dedicated reviewers whose efforts make possible each issue of Computer. We rely on and highly value the peer review process and the reviewers who are at its very core. Our reviewers contribute by reviewing papers as assigned in their technical area of expertise. They often comment on organization and clarity, qu...
متن کاملInformation Exchange Article Validity of Resumé Reviewers’ Inferences Concerning Applicant Personality Based on Resumé Evaluation
Recruiters infer personal traits from job applicants’ resumés and use these inferences in evaluating job applicants’ employability. No research to date, however, has determined if resumé reviewers’ inferences of applicants’ personality drawn solely from resumé biographical data are valid. In the present study, resumé reviewers (N552) examined one of two applicant resumés and then described the ...
متن کاملPeer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers
The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...
متن کامل